Today, it is those who actively participate in the Progressive ideology that call out this complex dichotomy for what it really is: Capitalism presented to the public through different self-pronounced brands.
The second is that which originates from the top, those who are more financially stable and/or well-off. As has always been the case throughout civilization, this is where the political system is represented.
Part of the answer is obvious. They will coexist, no matter what. But the relationship between the two has always had their respective functions at odds with each other, due to the concept of Money and Finance as being dependent on limitation of reproduction. Even to this day, the concept dictates that the more of a currency is produced, the less value it has. This very concept of assigning value is the sole reason why Economics and Environment have failed to coexist peacefully and productively. The U.S. Dollar, or ‘Petrodollar’, is the best example of this.
Most of the improvements in clean energy use and energy efficiency are attributed to advances in countries who have economic freedom and freer trade than our own. These countries have created a on-going cycle of investment, innovation, and dynamic economic growth.
American Oligarchy & The Myth of Meritocracy By: Marcus Perriello | Our Voice Contributor Most people don’t give the intricate […]
Is It Time For Universal Healthcare? By: Ted Beust | Our Voice Contributor Healthcare is a hot-button issue that Americans […]
Is Corporatism Really Modern-Day Feudalism? By: Marcus Perriello | Our Voice Contributor If one sorts through the details of our […]
Most people would prefer the former, but as President John Kennedy once said, “Those who make the peaceful revolution impossible make the violent revolution inevitable.”
By The Numbers: The Package Deal Explained By: Marcus Perriello | Our Voice Contributor We face a dire situation in […]
Healthcare in Canada By: Ted Beust | Our Voice Contributor The last time we discussed healthcare we took a look […]